There are numerous features of the newest test and methods that will limit the interpretation and you may effect of our own results. Earliest, the present day search utilized a convenience sample of players exactly who mind-picked to sign up this study; for this reason, the research can be minimal into the generalizability. Also, the brand new definitions of several CNM matchmaking within investigation will most likely not correctly mirror significance players got of those matchmaking orientations (e.grams., would people who practice class sex pick because swingers?). In addition, it questionnaire got some that-items measures (we.age., the fresh societal point, promiscuity, and you can STI evaluations), though such critiques was indeed expected into the a continual, within-subject manner. Finally, this study was correlational and therefore causality cannot be assessed.
Thought together with her, our results imply that the latest halo perception to monogamy is not including robust whenever experts take into account the relationship arrangement away from the fresh new fellow member your/herself while various CNM relationships are looked at independently. Alot more specifically, in most instances, CNM users critiques away from personal distance getting goals from the relationship direction it identify which have failed to high differ from studies getting monogamous aim (e.g., polyamorous participants’ recommendations off personal point having polyamorous plans don’t notably range from polyamorous players evaluations of monogamous objectives). Additionally, performance recommend that thinking from STI likelihood will get subscribe stigma to your CNM dating, if or not rationalized or otherwise not, and also signifies that not absolutely all CNM dating was viewed just as (in keeping with early in the day really works from the Matsick et al., 2014). (lebih…)